Compare . AI development

    AISD vs. Turing

    Turing is a global talent cloud with 3M+ developers and AI-powered matching. AISD is a focused AI agency with senior-only teams that build and ship production systems. Different scale, different model.

    Updated . 2026-05-02 . 5 min read

    Side-by-side

    The comparison

    FactorAISDTuring
    ModelAI-native agency. Coordinated senior squads build and ship your system end-to-endGlobal talent cloud. Turing matches you with remote engineers from a pool of 3M+ developers worldwide
    AI specialization100% AI-focused. Every service, every engineer, every process is built around AI deliveryAI is one category among many. Turing staffs full-stack, mobile, DevOps, data, and AI roles
    Team size & senioritySmall, senior-only squads. Every engineer ships code from day 1. No bench, no juniorsLarge pool. Seniority varies. Turing uses AI-based vetting to filter candidates, but you still interview and select
    SpeedWorking agent in 14 days, MVP in 6 weeks. Hard timelines in every proposalEngineer matching in 3-5 days. Production speed depends on your management and project complexity
    PricingPublic pricing. Discovery from $8K. MVPs from $50K. Staff aug from $75/hrTransparent hourly rates. Typical senior AI engineer: $60-100/hr. Lower cost due to global talent pool
    Delivery ownershipAISD owns the outcome. Architecture, implementation, eval, deployment, and handoffYou own the outcome. Turing provides the engineer. Project management is on your team
    Best forTeams that need a production AI system shipped fast without building an internal team to manage itTeams with existing engineering leadership that need to add AI capacity at competitive hourly rates

    The honest take

    When Turing is the better choice

    If you have a strong engineering org and need to add AI capacity at competitive rates, Turing's global pool gives you access to talent that might cost 2-3x in the US market. Their AI-powered vetting reduces hiring friction.

    Turing also shines for long-term staffing needs where you want engineers embedded in your team for 6-12+ months. The per-hour economics get better over time.

    When AISD is the better choice

    If you need a production AI system and don't have the internal leadership to manage individual engineers, AISD delivers the whole thing. Architecture, build, evaluation, deployment, and handoff with a runbook.

    AISD is also a better fit when speed matters more than cost per hour. A coordinated senior squad shipping in 6 weeks beats assembling and ramping individual engineers over months.

    Next step

    See if AISD is the right fit.

    30 minutes. No pitch deck. We'll tell you honestly whether AISD is the right partner for your problem.