Compare . AI development
AISD vs. Turing
Turing is a global talent cloud with 3M+ developers and AI-powered matching. AISD is a focused AI agency with senior-only teams that build and ship production systems. Different scale, different model.
Updated . 2026-05-02 . 5 min read
Side-by-side
The comparison
| Factor | AISD | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| Model | AI-native agency. Coordinated senior squads build and ship your system end-to-end | Global talent cloud. Turing matches you with remote engineers from a pool of 3M+ developers worldwide |
| AI specialization | 100% AI-focused. Every service, every engineer, every process is built around AI delivery | AI is one category among many. Turing staffs full-stack, mobile, DevOps, data, and AI roles |
| Team size & seniority | Small, senior-only squads. Every engineer ships code from day 1. No bench, no juniors | Large pool. Seniority varies. Turing uses AI-based vetting to filter candidates, but you still interview and select |
| Speed | Working agent in 14 days, MVP in 6 weeks. Hard timelines in every proposal | Engineer matching in 3-5 days. Production speed depends on your management and project complexity |
| Pricing | Public pricing. Discovery from $8K. MVPs from $50K. Staff aug from $75/hr | Transparent hourly rates. Typical senior AI engineer: $60-100/hr. Lower cost due to global talent pool |
| Delivery ownership | AISD owns the outcome. Architecture, implementation, eval, deployment, and handoff | You own the outcome. Turing provides the engineer. Project management is on your team |
| Best for | Teams that need a production AI system shipped fast without building an internal team to manage it | Teams with existing engineering leadership that need to add AI capacity at competitive hourly rates |
The honest take
When Turing is the better choice
If you have a strong engineering org and need to add AI capacity at competitive rates, Turing's global pool gives you access to talent that might cost 2-3x in the US market. Their AI-powered vetting reduces hiring friction.
Turing also shines for long-term staffing needs where you want engineers embedded in your team for 6-12+ months. The per-hour economics get better over time.
When AISD is the better choice
If you need a production AI system and don't have the internal leadership to manage individual engineers, AISD delivers the whole thing. Architecture, build, evaluation, deployment, and handoff with a runbook.
AISD is also a better fit when speed matters more than cost per hour. A coordinated senior squad shipping in 6 weeks beats assembling and ramping individual engineers over months.